NeXT Computer and Pixar used

fertieg50

Maybe. Jobs 史蒂夫沃兹 high school is recognized by a close friend of talented young inventors and engineers, in their adolescence,comparable to the Windows platform, Jobs and collaborated on several projects, including the invasion of the telephone company network and production of electronic games. However,the new Z600 series Atom processor, as time goes by, their respective division of responsibilities is still clear: Ward is responsible for designing and developing products, while doing the search for Steve Jobs rushed to customers, partners and suppliers. These projects eventually became something of value to others, in 1976, Jobs persuaded Woz to his energy into Apple's cooperation.

What to you think you have been at Apple, NeXT Computer and Pixar used?

(Translator's Note: Pixar Animation Studios, established in 1986, has been produced ten animated films. can be described as a following on the animated Disney film history after the most far-reaching company; company acquired by Disney in 2006 and became a wholly owned subsidiary. Next Computer Corporation, Steve Jobs left Apple in the 80's after the founder of computer company, later changed to focus on developing software NeXTStep software company. After acquired by Apple.)

I think I always identify who are the real smart people, and their contacts. Involved in my work, not a major can be done by a separate one, or two, three, four people to complete. Some people can complete a good thing, such as Michelangelo, and other manufacturing work,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], such as semiconductors and the construction of 747, this type of work requires a large number of people to complete. In order to do your good work can not be done by one person only, you must find the ability to extraordinary people.

summarize the main points of the observed data is that for most things in life, the average quality and dynamic range of the highest quality up to 2 to 1. For example, if in New York, the best taxi cab and the average level of 20% compared to the speed may be incremental. In the computer, the best personal computer personal computer may be better than the average 30%. This area is not much difference. 2 to 1, you will find very little difference. Can choose any one.

However, in my areas of interest - the former hardware design - and I note that the average person can complete the work and the best people to complete the work than The dynamic range is 50 or 100 to 1. Given this situation, I suggest you go for the elite of the elite. This is what we do. Then you can create a performance dedicated to the pursuit of A + team of employees. A + performance by the team of employees can easily exceed the results from the B and C employees constitute a large team. This is what I try to do.

So you think you can do is to recruit?
This is not limited to recruitment. After recruitment, the establishment of a people feel the same talented people together and working environment, and their work is much more important than others. Feel will have significant influence, all of these things are part of the long-term clear goals. Recruitment is usually not a person you can do,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], so I found in recruiting and hiring staff for the A-level training in a certain way is the best. Will be interviewed and the company for at least 12 different areas, not just the expected areas of work and his people talk. This method can make your A-level company employees more extensive contacts, and if they feel strong enough, you can also support their corporate culture - can veto candidates for existing employees.

It seems a waste of time.

is true. We interviewed nine candidates for the ten employees are great, only one employee to apply for the post is really a problem, so we would not hire him. This process is very time-consuming and very hard, and if not properly managed could lead to real problems. But overall, this is a very good idea.

However, in a typical emerging companies,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], management may not always have time to recruit other people.

I do not agree. I think this is the most important work. Suppose you are running your own company and want to find a new partner. You will spend a lot of time to find a partner, right? He will be your company's other half. Why should I spend less time to find a third, fourth or one fifth of the company's employees? When you are in a new company,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], the beginning of the ten people will determine the success of the company. Everyone is the company's 10%. So why not spend more time as possible to find all the A-level employees? If one of the three is not good enough, why do you want a company 30% of the employees are not good enough then? Small firms more than large companies rely on good employees.

	Forum Forum Czata Toruń wp.pl Strona Główna -> Linux	Wszystkie czasy w strefie EET (Europa)
Strona 1 z 1